New supervisory system for CPs

Feature Requests
1

As we know, every CP needs a supervisor when hosting sessions. It’s not hard to tell, that the amount of CPs is overwhelming for CAC and so it is for CPs themselves. Our CAC+ are humans as well, so to make it easier for them, I think we should introduce a new supervisory system. Basically, a CP would need a supervisor for at least 5 of his sessions. Then, if a CAC+ deems that this Chairperson doesn’t need to be supervised anymore, he/she can host Shifts by themselves. If not, the CP would have to be supervised for another (5) sessions. After that, CAC+ would decide again. Looped.

– How will this improve Stateview?
It will be easier for CPs to find supervisors and CAC+ won’t be spammed with supervisory requests.

3 Likes
2

How about they have to record every session as well, and submit it in #patrol-logs?

2 Likes
3

Not all CPs have Nitro and recording would be really inconvenient.

4

I honestly kinda agree to some sort of system like this. I don’t see any bad in this other than the fact that everyone would take advantage of it as much as they can.
Maybe a role in-between Chairperson and Facility Director? Or something like Trainee Chairperson?

1 Like
5

They already do this, we can’t see it as it is in the Intel server I believe and is hidden. They do session logs in there.

6

Then have something like Trusted CP then?