i have two sides to this, i agree and disagree. the reason i disagree is because superintendents already have difficulties to get chairperson, putting another rank in the middle makes it harder for SV to gain high ranks. now, the reason i agree is due to the unprofessionalism in sessions, especially in the rank of “chairperson”. dont get me wrong, there are lot of good chairpersons although at the same time there arent, majority is not good. i know many people say chairperson isnt big or anything although that rank is the rank that hosts most sessions, adding chief SIs creates more professionalism for members who achieve higher ranks, this makes the game much better and lower ranks can actually learn how to play the game. (now before people who are higher ranks them me say i dont have an opinion, i am a former prison commissioner so dont get mad at me for putting input because im an LR)
Bro. We DO NOT need 2 ranks before you can even get CP. Btw, there is NO WAY a MR rank should have staff cuffs and spectate permissions for all sessions. Picture this: Someone modcalls on a CSI for fire functionality abuse. GA arrives and teleports/brings the abuser. The CSI cuffs and fires him. What now?
You are citing democracy in the vote - giving the people power. However, you must open your eyes to see that the people are stupid, and have no business voting in adding this useless and soon-to-be trouble-riddled rank. This is an unintelligent, ignorant, dense, brainless, mindless, foolish, dull-witted, dull, slow-witted, witless, slow, dunce-like, simple-minded, empty-headed, vacuous, vapid, halfwitted, idiotic, moronic, imbecilic, obtuse, doltish, gullible , naive , thick , dim , dumb , dopey , dozy , crazy , cretinous , birdbrained , peabrained , pig-ignorant , bovine , slow on the uptake , soft in the head , brain-dead , boneheaded , lamebrained , thickheaded , chuckleheaded , dunderheaded , wooden , wooden-headed , fat-headed , muttonheaded , daft , barmy , not the full shilling , thick as two short planks , silly , scatterbrained , crackbrained , nonsensical , senseless , irresponsible , unthinking , ill-advised , ill-considered , inept , damfool , unwise , injudicious , indiscreet , short-sighted , inane , absurd , ludicrous , ridiculous , laughable , risible , fatuous , asinine , pointless , meaningless , futile , fruitless , mad , insane , lunatic , cracked , half-baked , cock-eyed , harebrained , nutty , derpy , cuckoo , loony , loopy , zany , screwy , off one’s head , off one’s trolley , out to lunch , potty , dotty , batty , gormless , and glaikit idea. TLDR: CSI is already not a good idea, and your suggestion for the rank’s powers are shockingly even worse.
I get that I’m an SI myself and that this could look as if I don’t want CSI just because it takes longer to rank up, but that’s not at all what I’m concerned about. Honestly, if this rank would be added, I’m not sure that giving a rank level to CSI would be necessary. This rank as a whole wouldn’t help Stateview in any way in my opinion as the distinction between inactive and active SIs is through their promotion to Chairperson. In my opinion, CSI should not be added, but it’s under my control. Your idea of CSI would definetly need some fixing and adjustment before if and only it became the rank above Superintendent. In all honesty however, it’s adding a rank where one is not needed. From my past experience, Superintendent did not exist for awhile. It was just Warden-Chairperson. Hence, there’s no reason to add another rank just before users can host, co-host, etc.
Tldr: If CSI is added, it needs some serious changes from the ones listen by the OP.
Thanks for your time,
ii_Oranjey (SI)
FD can’t even spectate shifts, no rank can cuff lower ranks, level 110 doesn’t fit in the rank line thing ur probs just level 110 and want to get it and there would be more chief superintendent then normal superintendent if there was a quiz
Well, let the community decide if this rank is going to be established or not. Just look at the votes. And the community is also going to set up the perks so see for yourself.
Another reply: The rank CSI will be used as a rank that maintains order mainly among the SIs. I have seen many SIs who doesn’t use grammar and abuses the LRs with their supposed authority. They would not budge when I insist them to use grammar when the requirement to use grammar is PI+.
I hate people who don’t use proper grammar when they are required to.
I’d rather you read the sentences people have typed for you instead of avoiding them like the plague. Btw, this is pretty obvious that you just want to gain more power in SV considering it’s likely that you are above level 110.
SIs should just have quota instead so it can filter out the bad ones
Not even CPs can do this (which is a rank above!) Too much power for the first MR.
this is already being voted on bro and 1k:300 people say add csi, no debate at all
Yeah so the dev team is talking about this, so I guess it is fine. Just make sure they don’t have too much power.
Esb678
I like the idea of the rank, but I don’t agree with the permissions that they should have.
This is a horrible idea and has chance for so much abuse people ranked FD do not have staff cuffs Game administrators do not have staff cuffs CSI isn’t that special that it needs staff cuffs. CSI Job is not to moderate the game or punish players This is GA job and for staff cuffs and fire feature that is for OC. SI is only achievable via passing a training as a warden so why should you be able to achieve CSI by getting to a level and passing a quiz. These just seems like a suggestion you would want to benefit you so if you got CSI you would have more power.
multipsumo768
yea no
Signed,
FNTConnorr,
Events Team,
Community Advisory Council.
Good rank idea, bad permissions and requirements.
Esb678
At first I had thought that this was a very good idea, then I remembered that commanders think they’re so powerful. If we add the role chief superintendent AND they have cuffs, it will enduce the imperiousness of the staff team. No one wants to add it so don’t add it. They will be bossing the CaC around and they will forget they are below people. Do not add the role of chief superintendent.
no
characters
This text will be hidden
I never said that they could boss the CAC. Even the CPs could boss them.